MCP · Web
Brave Search
Real-time web search via Brave API. Private alternative to WebSearch. Useful when your context needs fresh info (news, prices, competitors).
Official docs ↗Free up to 2000 queries/month
Use cases
- ›This week's news on a topic
- ›Up-to-date competitor pricing/features
- ›Fact-check a quote or stat
Installation
1.Create an account on api.search.brave.com. Free plan up to 2,000 queries/month, enough for heavy personal use.
2.One line, one terminal
$ claude mcp add brave -- npx -y brave-search-mcp --key=YOUR_API_KEYNeed to install Claude Code first? See the Claude Code page · Official docs
Concrete examples
›
"Qu'est-ce qui s'est passé cette semaine dans l'UCaaS européen ? 3 infos majeures max."Real-time web search + relevance sort. Useful to prep a brief or quick post.
Sample output
→ Brave search (window: 7d, topic: UCaaS Europe) 3 key updates 1. RingCentral announced closing its Paris office Source: Les Échos, Apr 12. 35 employees impacted, their FR market share stays. Signal: consolidation underway. 2. Wildix acquires Enreach Partner UK Source: Silicon.co.uk, Apr 14. Enreach exits UK, Wildix strengthens its position. Deal at ~£80m per unofficial sources. 3. Arcep publishes its report on enterprise VoIP quality Source: Arcep.fr, Apr 15. 3 operators flagged for peak-hour service degradation. The report can serve as a counter-argument to those who question UCaaS reliability vs physical PBX. Items 2 and 3 deserve a post or an editorial angle.
›
"Vérifie la stat : 'les posts LinkedIn avec question augmentent l'engagement de 50%'. Source et fiabilité ?"Fact-checking. Claude searches the primary source, evaluates reliability, flags if the stat is repeated without source.
Sample output
→ Brave search: "LinkedIn posts question engagement 50%"
Fact-check result: UNRELIABLE
- The stat has circulated since 2019 in SEO articles ("10 tips for LinkedIn
engagement...")
- No primary source found: not LinkedIn official, not academic research,
not credible analytics tools (Hootsuite, Sprout, Buffer publish
different stats)
- Closest study: Buffer 2023, 1.3M posts analyzed. Posts with questions
have +22% engagement (not 50%).
Recommendation: don't use "50%" in your content. Use "~20%" with a Buffer
reference, or a less precise phrasing ("posts with questions perform
better").